Articles Posted in Discrimination and Unlawful Harassment

 

ChatGPT-Image-Sep-3-2025-09_22_21-PM

The Seventh Circuit has made clear it is inclined to hold that the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) permits hostile work environment claims. At the same time, the court reminded employers that recognition is not enough. Plaintiffs still need proof, and speculation will not do. Continue reading

Posted in:
Updated:

ChatGPT-Image-Aug-27-2025-10_47_00-PM-1024x683

Missing narcotics. A dazed nurse. Co-workers whispering. A trip to the ER. It sounds like the plot of a medical drama, but it was the real backdrop for a recent Seventh Circuit employment case. The outcome offers lessons for every employer, not just hospitals. Continue reading

ChatGPT-Image-Aug-25-2025-09_37_38-PM

An employee asked for a religious exemption, was denied, suspended, and then reinstated once litigation began. The Fifth Circuit’s majority brushed the case aside on a technicality. But a dissenting judge warned that when it comes to religious accommodations, delay can itself be discrimination. Continue reading

ChatGPT-Image-Aug-24-2025-05_25_02-PM-1024x683

Religious-accommodation requests are getting harder for employers to navigate, especially when they collide with policies meant to support transgender employees. The Seventh Circuit just reminded us that employers cannot lean on complaints or speculation alone. A jury will decide whether denying an accommodation is justified by a true “undue hardship.” Continue reading

ChatGPT-Image-Aug-20-2025-08_25_14-PM

The EEOC just sent another loud message: religious rights at work are front and center.

Think you can brush off a job candidate the moment they mention a religious accommodation? The EEOC just reminded employers again that this is a fast track to litigation, a costly payout, and years of government oversight. And this case is part of a much bigger story: the agency’s current enforcement push on religious liberty. Continue reading

ChatGPT-Image-Aug-19-2025-10_08_28-PM-683x1024

A jail administrator posted apocalyptic religious commentary online. A reporter found it, published a story, and suddenly the county faced community outrage and questions from federal officials about whether they would continue housing inmates at the jail. The county fired the administrator. The employee sued under Title VII.

The Eighth Circuit just said: not so fast. Continue reading

“Doing What’s Right – Not Just What’s Legal”
Contact Information