Search
From Termination To Trial: Why Employers Need a Consistent Story
It’s rare for an employee claiming discrimination to have a “smoking gun” piece of evidence. I’ve yet to defend a case where an employer outright says, “We’re firing you, old man, because you’re just too damn old.” Instead, most plaintiffs have to rely on circumstantial evidence to prove their case.
In age discrimination claims, that often means poking holes in the employer’s stated reasons for termination—showing inconsistencies, contradictions, or just plain weak excuses. And that’s precisely what happened in a recent Ninth Circuit case. Continue reading