Close

The Employer Handbook Blog

Updated:

When employees claim that your company failed to pay their overtime, you win if your company does this.

The Fair Labor Standards Act requires employers to pay covered nonexempt workers overtime pay at a rate not less than one and one-half times the regular rate of pay after 40 hours of work in a workweek. So what happens when employees claim not to receive premium overtime pay despite…

Updated:

If the same person sexually harasses a man and a woman, does that cancel each other out?

MicroZesTo, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons If you’re asking that question to the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the answer is no. At the end of last week, the EEOC announced that it had sued two companies allegedly violating federal law when they failed to prevent and correct ongoing…

Updated:

What do you do with employees who refuse to use a coworker’s preferred pronouns?

You develop policies and train everyone — especially your managers — on how to handle situations like the example I have for you today. This lawsuit involves a plaintiff who filed a complaint — remember, these are just allegations — stating that she routinely interacted with a coworker with female…

Updated:

A new bill in Congress would protect civil rights at work from religious freedoms

Yesterday, on the same day that some of the Supreme Court noted that Congress hadn’t changed Title VII’s undue hardship standard for religious accommodations, the House and Senate reintroduced the Do No Harm Act, which the bill sponsors claim will “address the increasing use of religious freedom as a justification…

Updated:

Wait, what? Court says ‘good fit’ isn’t necessarily code for discrimination or retaliation.

Employment lawyers and HR professionals generally preach that employees view “it’s not a good fit” to explain their termination of employment as code for discrimination or retaliation. It’s HR101. But yesterday, a federal court of appeals explained that this well-intentioned but often misconstrued rationale isn’t always a thinly-veiled, pretextual excuse…

Updated:

Choose your words carefully when using noncompetition agreements

  Many courts are generally reluctant to enforce noncompetes. And sometimes employers make their tasks even easier. For example, I read a state appellate court decision last night in which a company tried to enforce a three-year, thirty-mile noncompete against its former nurse practitioner that would prevent her from “provide[ing]…

Updated:

I’m naturally skeptical when an employee claims sexual orientation bias against straight people.

So when the plaintiff in this federal court decision I read last night cited as evidence of her employer’s heterosexual animus that her gay coworker received a cake and party by gay supervisors on his 30th work anniversary, whereas she did not receive cake or party for the same occasion,…

Updated:

Close counts in horseshoes and accommodating individuals with disabilities at work

Last night, I read a federal appellate court decision in which an employee with back spasms, sciatica, fibromyalgia, and pinched nerves claimed that her employer didn’t give her the help she needed to do her job. The plaintiff requested a “standing footrest” and “ergonomic chair” as reasonable accommodations. But she…

Updated:

400,000 reasons not to have this pregnancy policy in your workplace

Yesterday, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission announced (here) that an employer will fork over $400,000, split among 11 women, stemming from a written policy that violates both the Pregnancy Discrimination Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act. According to the EEOC’s complaint it filed in federal court in 2021,…

Updated:

Since when do courts get to second-guess an employer’s hiring decisions? Since last Monday.

On April 10, 2023, Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Amul R. Thapar offered his two cents on the role the federal courts should have in second-guessing the business judgment of companies making hiring decisions: Ignoring decades of precedent, the majority opinion imposes a rule requiring employers to favor credentials over relevant…