Articles Posted in Discrimination and Unlawful Harassment

| by

noun-missing-2680964-1024x1024

The complexities of the interactive process in disability accommodation requests can trip up even the most experienced HR professionals, especially because no two situations are alike. However, there is an immutable rule: an employee’s voluntary withdrawal from the interactive process and failure to provide the requested medical documentation show a lack of good faith. And lack of good faith spells doom for a failure-to-accommodate claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Continue reading

| by

noun-classroom-2941888-1024x1024

Imagine you’re at school, and there’s a teacher who always picks on you, blames you for things you didn’t do, and makes you feel terrible in front of your classmates. You might think, “This is so unfair! I want to tell someone and make it stop!” Well, grown-ups at work can feel the same way when their boss or coworkers mistreat them. But, like in school, not every mean thing a teacher or classmate does is against the rules. Sometimes, it must be really bad for the grown-ups to get help from the law. Continue reading

| by

noun-surgeon-7103615-1024x1024

The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit recently dissected a bariatric surgeon’s discrimination claims. The surgeon alleged that his former employer discriminated against him based on his race and color when it favored another surgeon who allegedly harassed the plaintiff. However, the plaintiff misdiagnosed the situation.

Let’s explore why his arguments flatlined.

Continue reading

| by

noun-lawyer-6243847-1024x1024

In a recent decision, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York granted summary judgment in favor of the defendant, dismissing the plaintiff’s age discrimination claims under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). This case serves as a critical reminder for employment lawyers and human resources professionals about the stringent requirements for establishing a prima facie case of age discrimination under the McDonnell Douglas framework. And yes, it also serves as a reminder that sometimes, the law can be as unforgiving as a Monday morning without coffee. Continue reading

| by

noun-7397823-1024x1024
Human resources professionals often encounter bizarre and unexpected situations, especially around the holidays. However, few can top the case where an employee’s choice of attire—or lack thereof—led to a significant legal battle over retaliatory discharge. This recent federal court decision serves as a humorous yet critical reminder of the importance of timing and documentation in handling retaliation claims.

The Incident: A Wardrobe Malfunction

Picture this: It’s a typical evening in February 2022, and a truck driver for a hauling and grading company arrives at a warehouse in Houston, Texas. As she navigates the lot, she spots a co-worker strolling in front of his tractor wearing nothing but underwear and penny loafers. Naturally, she Facetimes another co-worker to share the “very odd and uncomfortable sight.”

Continue reading

| by

noun-lawsuit-7179526-1024x1024

On Christmas Eve day, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) announced it had filed a significant lawsuit alleging discrimination based on disability and sex during the hiring process. The case centers around an individual who suffers from endometriosis, a condition that causes severe menstrual cramps, nausea, and headaches, potentially rendering her bedridden for one to two days during her menstrual periods. The EEOC claims that the employer failed to hire her due to her disability and did not provide reasonable accommodation, violating the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. Continue reading

| by

noun-supreme-court-149365

In October, I blogged about the Supreme Court’s decision to weigh in on whether a heightened standard should apply when heterosexual workers, white men, or any employees in a majority group claim discrimination at work. The case has garnered significant attention due to its potential impact on workplace discrimination laws.

Now, the United States government is providing its two cents to the Supreme Court before it decides whether these so-called “reverse discrimination” claims require a plaintiff to present “background circumstances” on top of Title VII’s other requirements to establish that their employer is the “unusual” one who discriminates against the majority. Continue reading

| by

noun-wearable-7080645-1024x1024

Yesterday, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) announced the release of a new fact sheet titled “Wearables in the Workplace: The Use of Wearables and Other Monitoring Technology Under Federal Employment Discrimination Laws.” This document is crucial for human resources professionals as it provides guidance on using wearable technologies in compliance with federal employment discrimination laws. Here, I’ll summarize the key points of the fact sheet and offer some essential takeaways for HR professionals.

Continue reading

“Doing What’s Right – Not Just What’s Legal”
Contact Information

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Please do not include any confidential or sensitive information in a contact form, text message, or voicemail. The contact form sends information by non-encrypted email, which is not secure. Submitting a contact form, sending a text message, making a phone call, or leaving a voicemail does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Copyright © 2026, Eric B. Meyer
| All Rights Reserved Worldwide.
JUSTIA Law Firm Blog Design