Close

Articles Posted in Discrimination and Unlawful Harassment

Updated:

Yahoo! has a new no-telecommuting rule. Here’s why it may be unlawful.

Over the weekend, I read this article from Kara Swisher on AllThingsD.com, in which she reports that Yahoo!, under its new leadership, will implement a no-telecommuting rule, effective June 1. Ms. Swisher posted a copy of the internal Yahoo! memorandum to its employees, in which the company underscores the “critical”…

Updated:

@Eric_B_Meyer on DriveThruHR #dthr

Have you checked out DriveThruHR yet? DriveThruHR is the baby of Bryan Wempen and William Tincup, a half-hour radio show on which these two HR leaders, along with a guest, discuss the latest trends, thoughts and sentiment within the industry. Yesterday, I was on DriveThruHR, Human Resource’s #1 Daily Radio,…

Updated:

Discrimination claims drop in ’12; The Employer Handbook go BOOM!

Kudos to this blog for the drop in discrimination claims. Yeah, I’m giving this blog credit, and so is my mother — probably. {Mom couldn’t be reached for comment and, strangely, the EEOC press release touting the new FY12 charge statistics is silent about this blog} The year-end data shows…

Updated:

Fact or Fiction: Your employee’s nasty facial scar may be a disability

That’s right folks. It’s time for another edition of “Fact or Fiction” a/k/a “Quick Answers to Quick Questions” a/k/a QATQQ f/k/a “I don’t feel like writing a long blog post.” Your new employee at local pizzeria has what we’ll call a “facial deformity.” So, rather than having him work the…

Updated:

Supreme Court to decide how an employee must prove Title VII retaliation

What makes retaliation the most common discrimination claim in America? I suspect it’s because other forms of discrimination (e.g., race, gender, disability) are more difficult to prove and don’t always result in an adverse employment action, such as termination of employment. And since most people like to keep their jobs,…

Updated:

Who are YOU to tell ME that I’m not offended by sexual harassment?!?

The original working title for the post was “The Third Circuit takes a deuce on my ‘Pottymouths’ post.” I meant it in the figurative sense. Otherwise, I would be at a loss for words with IT. More so than usual… {Napalms browser history} But, fortunately, good taste and high morals…