Articles Posted in National Origin

ChatGPT-Image-Mar-15-2026-11_54_04-AM-1024x683

Some employment cases turn on close calls, messy comparators, or shaky documentation.

This one turned on something simpler: an employee who admitted to a string of workplace misconduct and still tried to turn the termination into a discrimination, retaliation, and hostile-work-environment case. Continue reading

ChatGPT-Image-Oct-12-2025-02_45_51-PM

When the agency that enforces the nation’s anti-discrimination laws ends up defending one of its own under Title VII, that is not just newsworthy. It is a lesson for every employer about how bias, inconsistency, and poor process can sneak into even the most compliance-minded workplaces. Continue reading

ChatGPT-Image-Aug-27-2025-10_47_00-PM-1024x683

Missing narcotics. A dazed nurse. Co-workers whispering. A trip to the ER. It sounds like the plot of a medical drama, but it was the real backdrop for a recent Seventh Circuit employment case. The outcome offers lessons for every employer, not just hospitals. Continue reading

 

ChatGPT-Image-Aug-14-2025-07_19_08-PM-1024x683

A performance review ended with a professor out of a job, and the employer defending itself in court. The problem? Remarks about maternity leave, inconsistent flexibility, and suspicious timing after a discrimination complaint. The appellate court said a jury should hear the case. Continue reading

ChatGPT-Image-May-13-2025-07_36_49-PM-683x1024

Fired Over $15. Or Was It the HR Complaints?

A laundromat worker reimbursed herself $15 from the register for a taxi fare—something she claimed was standard practice with a receipt. Three days later, she was fired. But because she had just complained about racial harassment, disability discrimination, and unpaid wages, the timing raised red flags.

The Second Circuit said a jury should decide whether she was fired for taking the $15—or for speaking up. Continue reading

ChatGPT-Image-Apr-14-2025-07_41_51-PM-683x1024

Some employers think they’ve found a silver bullet: delegate the tough call to someone else and—boom—problem solved, liability dodged. But as the Ninth Circuit recently reminded us, an “independent” reviewer isn’t a shield if they’re just channeling someone else’s bias. Continue reading

“Doing What’s Right – Not Just What’s Legal”
Contact Information