Some accommodation requests are straightforward. Others arrive wrapped in spiritual language but turn out to be personal views, broad objections, or political frustrations. A recent federal decision breaks down the elements courts look for in separating religious beliefs from non-religious objections. TL;DR: A federal court just explained how to…
Articles Posted in Pennsylvania
Preparing for the CROWN Act: A Pennsylvania Employer’s Guide to the New Hair-Based Discrimination Rules
Most employers are not trying to police anyone’s hairstyle, but vague grooming or “professional appearance” rules can sometimes cause problems. Pennsylvania’s upcoming CROWN Act aims to prevent that by making it clear that hair texture and protective styles are protected traits under the PHRA. That means it is a…
Do employees have a right to use slurs about their own group at work? A court called that absurd.
What if a Black employee uses the N-word in the workplace, directed at no one in particular, and gets fired? Can that employee claim race discrimination under Title VII? A federal judge in Pennsylvania just called that argument “an absurdity.” TL;DR: A Black employee fired for using the N-word claimed…
If an employee leaves for another job, that’s a career move—not a claim.
When an employee voluntarily resigns to work somewhere else, it may feel like fallout from a workplace conflict. But under Title VII, it isn’t punishment or “discipline.” TL;DR: A Philadelphia school employee who objected to a COVID-19 vaccination policy claimed religious discrimination after leaving for another teaching job. The Third…
Pumping rights after the PUMP Act: one employer’s old mistake, every employer’s modern lesson
An airline services company once thought a single scheduled break was enough time for a new mom to pump breast milk. The result? A federal lawsuit that is still headed to trial, and a reminder of what today’s PUMP for Nursing Mothers Act now makes crystal clear. TL;DR: A federal…
When Speech Crosses the Line: Anti-Discrimination Laws Protect People, Not Their Opinions
When a White Jewish university employee claimed discipline for racially charged remarks amounted to discrimination, the court disagreed. It called the case something else entirely, and in doing so, it drew an important boundary for every employer. TL;DR: A federal court just clarified a point that often gets blurred when discipline…
When policy violations aren’t hacking: Third Circuit shuts down employer’s scorched-earth lawsuit
It started with a sick day, a spreadsheet literally called “My Passwords.xlsx,” and a colleague trying to help. It ended with a company accusing two former employees of federal computer crimes and trade secret theft. The Third Circuit’s response? Nice try — but workplace policy violations aren’t hacking. TL;DR:…
Boss’s Politics, Union Talk, or Religious Views? NJ Says You Don’t Have to Listen
When employees clock in, they expect to do their jobs, not sit through political speeches, anti-union campaigns, or religious lectures from their boss. New Jersey just turned that expectation into a legal right. TL;DR: On September 3, Governor Murphy signed A4429/S3302 into law. It bans “captive audience” meetings, meaning mandatory…
🎷 ‘Careless Whisper’ Isn’t a Title VII Claim
Before we get to the law, let’s admit it: anytime a case involves a supervisor leaning in to whisper in someone’s ear, you can almost hear George Michael’s sax riff in the background. But as this recent federal court decision shows, not every whisper, awkward or otherwise, creates a…
When a Decade-Old Harassment Case Comes Back to Haunt You
You think you’ve solved the problem. You separate the employee from the alleged harasser. You tell him not to contact her—ever. Years pass without incident. Then one day, the same two people cross paths again, and a decision that stops short of firing her, but directly threatens her pay and…