Articles Posted in Discrimination and Unlawful Harassment

ChatGPT-Image-Sep-23-2025-07_26_51-PM-1024x683

Most HR professionals and lawyers know the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) bars refusing to hire someone because of age. But what about hiring policies that look neutral on their face, like experience caps or “recent graduate” preferences, that end up screening out older candidates? Courts have not agreed on whether the ADEA lets applicants challenge those practices. Congress is now stepping in with a bill to make the answer clear. Continue reading

Posted in:
Updated:

ChatGPT-Image-Sep-22-2025-10_49_18-PM-1024x683

Shanah Tovah! Wishing a Happy New Year to all who are celebrating Rosh Hashanah (שנה טובה).

With Yom Kippur approaching, here is a scenario to consider: An employee asks to work from home on the afternoon leading into the fast so they can log off early and get to synagogue without taking a full vacation day. Do you have to allow it?

That kind of request highlights a real-world question about religious accommodations in today’s workplace. And it is exactly the type of issue addressed in a new memo from the Department of Justice. The memo was written for federal agencies, but it serves as a reminder of how the law already applies. Private employers should pay attention because Title VII uses the same standards.
Continue reading

ChatGPT-Image-Sep-16-2025-09_51_35-PM-1024x683

A longtime CFO thought his company’s succession plan was rigged against him in favor of a female candidate for CEO. He sued, claiming sex discrimination and retaliation. Thanks to recent Supreme Court guidance, men bringing reverse discrimination claims no longer face extra procedural hurdles. That makes these cases easier to start. But as this Sixth Circuit opinion shows, they are still hard to finish without evidence that sex was the real reason for the decision. Continue reading

ChatGPT-Image-Sep-14-2025-10_34_07-PM

Sometimes it is not the reduction in force itself that creates risk, but the combination of what is said and how the data is applied. In this case, six words from a supervisor, “a potential strain on the department,” together with disputed productivity metrics and the treatment of a pregnant employee returning from FMLA leave, convinced the Sixth Circuit that a jury should decide. Continue reading

1757931531394-copy
Retaliation cases often turn on timing, but this one shows that even years after the fact, employers can still be on the hook. Add in a secretly recorded “smoking gun” conversation, and you have a recipe for a costly settlement.


TL;DR: The EEOC announced a $350,000 settlement with two Arkansas healthcare entities accused of firing a physician assistant in retaliation for her role in a sexual harassment investigation. The case shows that retaliation protections apply to anyone who participates in such investigations, that liability can extend even years after the protected activity, and that recordings of workplace conversations can be decisive.

📰Read the EEOC’s press release.

 

ChatGPT-Image-Sep-8-2025-10_23_02-PM-1024x683

Before we get to the law, let’s admit it: anytime a case involves a supervisor leaning in to whisper in someone’s ear, you can almost hear George Michael’s sax riff in the background. But as this recent federal court decision shows, not every whisper, awkward or otherwise, creates a viable harassment or retaliation claim. Continue reading

 

ChatGPT-Image-Sep-3-2025-09_22_21-PM

The Seventh Circuit has made clear it is inclined to hold that the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) permits hostile work environment claims. At the same time, the court reminded employers that recognition is not enough. Plaintiffs still need proof, and speculation will not do. Continue reading

Posted in:
Updated:
“Doing What’s Right – Not Just What’s Legal”
Contact Information