Close

Articles Posted in Gender

Updated:

Here are forty thousand reasons why “equal pay for equal work” applies to male victims too

A federal law called the Equal Pay Act requires that men and women in the same workplace receive equal pay for equal work. The jobs need not be identical, but they must be substantially equal. While women often seek relief under this statute, a state government agency learned the hard…

Updated:

New employment laws may not just expose employers to liability; they may double it!

Among the top employment issues that companies will need to navigate in 2024 is enforcing laws that have more recently taken effect. Take the PUMP for Nursing Mothers Act, for example. The PUMP Act, which amended the Fair Labor Standards Act, took effect in December 2022. It provides additional workplace…

Updated:

“Oh, they paid you less than market value? Yes, we love your novel equal pay legal theory. Tell us more!”

If only a federal appellate court had reacted that way when a female plaintiff claimed an equal pay violation because she and other females were paid less than the “local industry standard.” But, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals wasn’t buying the ‘back-of-the-envelope math’ the plaintiff was selling. Allow me to…

Updated:

Did you know that a bird — a macaw, specifically — can create a hostile work environment?

Last year, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission sued a long-term care facility claiming that certain White patients/residents repeatedly directed offensive racial slurs at black nurses and nurse assistants, including “n—-r,” “coon,” “monkey,” and “Black b—–s.” One patient repeatedly told Black employees to “go back to Africa,” followed Black employees…

Updated:

Can we fire an employee who complains about discrimination and is dead wrong?

I mean, sure. It’s a free country. This isn’t Communist Russia. But if your company is concerned about a subsequent retaliation claim, read on. Today’s lesson comes courtesy of this Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals decision. The plaintiffs brought gender discrimination (equal pay) and retaliation claims after the defendants terminated…

Updated:

Does Title VII only cover ultimate employment decisions? Another federal appellate court doesn’t think so.

Imagine a business that gives its employees two days off each week. There’s nothing abnormal about that. However, the company uses a sex-based policy to determine which two days an employee can pick. Only men can select full weekends off—women cannot. Instead, female employees can pick either two weekdays off…

Updated:

EEOC: HR Manager used code words and other directives to staffing agencies to discriminate.

A few weeks ago, I blogged here about how a federal appellate court concluded that firing someone who isn’t a ‘good fit’ isn’t necessarily a coded phrase for discrimination. Still, I generally recommend to clients that they be more direct when terminating someone’s employment by explaining the legitimate business reason(s)…

Updated:

Being denied coverage to use the bathroom (and a bunch of other stuff that isn’t discrimination)

When employees allege discrimination, they must prove an employer’s discriminatory motive and connect it to a particular adverse employment decision. An adverse action requires evidence of a significant change in employment status, benefits, or pay. Usually, the proof comes in the form of failure to hire, a firing, failure to promote,…

Updated:

How does an employee go from “promotable” to “expandable” to plaintiff claiming gender bias?

Litigators often counsel witnesses to answer, “I don’t recall,” rather than guess or speculate the response to a question at a deposition. But, sometimes, that approach can backfire. The female plaintiff in this recent Third Circuit opinion I read last night worked as a manager in the defendant’s finance department.…