Articles Posted in Sexual Harassment

| by

 

ChatGPT-Image-Nov-15-2025-06_36_35-PM

Employees and supervisors often assume that any inappropriate physical contact is automatically a hostile work environment. But the Eleventh Circuit continues to apply one of the strictest “severe or pervasive” standards in the country. This case shows just how high that bar is.

This is part two of the series. Yesterday’s post covered why a criminal subpoena did not count as Title VII “participation.” Today, we look at the employee’s hostile work environment claim. Continue reading

| by

ChatGPT-Image-Oct-28-2025-10_59_29-PM-1024x683

The Supreme Court recently made it easier for employees to prove discrimination, lowering the bar from “serious harm” to “some harm.” That change came from a 2024 sex discrimination case, but its reasoning can influence other Title VII claims too. A new decision from the federal court in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania shows that even when courts apply that softer standard to quid pro quo harassment claims, retaliation still requires a higher level of proof, and neither test was met here. Continue reading

| by

ChatGPT-Image-Sep-27-2025-09_58_03-AM

In 2022, Congress passed a law that makes it harder for employers to require arbitration in certain workplace cases. Some employees are now trying to use that law to keep sex discrimination lawsuits in court. A recent case in Connecticut shows the limits of that strategy: not every sex discrimination claim counts as sexual harassment, and only sexual harassment (or sexual assault) cases are exempt from arbitration. Continue reading

| by

 

ChatGPT-Image-Sep-8-2025-10_23_02-PM-1024x683

Before we get to the law, let’s admit it: anytime a case involves a supervisor leaning in to whisper in someone’s ear, you can almost hear George Michael’s sax riff in the background. But as this recent federal court decision shows, not every whisper, awkward or otherwise, creates a viable harassment or retaliation claim. Continue reading

| by

ChatGPT-Image-Aug-3-2025-11_05_26-PM-1024x683

You think you’ve solved the problem. You separate the employee from the alleged harasser. You tell him not to contact her—ever. Years pass without incident. Then one day, the same two people cross paths again, and a decision that stops short of firing her, but directly threatens her pay and job security, is enough to keep a quid pro quo sexual harassment claim alive. Continue reading

| by

ChatGPT-Image-Apr-3-2025-12_11_36-AM

A recent decision from the Third Circuit shows how courts are looking closely—not just at what arbitration agreements say, but also at how they’re rolled out. And even if a dispute doesn’t qualify for the new federal carveout for sexual harassment claims, employers still need to be ready to prove their agreements are enforceable. Continue reading

| by

noun-7397823-1024x1024
Human resources professionals often encounter bizarre and unexpected situations, especially around the holidays. However, few can top the case where an employee’s choice of attire—or lack thereof—led to a significant legal battle over retaliatory discharge. This recent federal court decision serves as a humorous yet critical reminder of the importance of timing and documentation in handling retaliation claims.

The Incident: A Wardrobe Malfunction

Picture this: It’s a typical evening in February 2022, and a truck driver for a hauling and grading company arrives at a warehouse in Houston, Texas. As she navigates the lot, she spots a co-worker strolling in front of his tractor wearing nothing but underwear and penny loafers. Naturally, she Facetimes another co-worker to share the “very odd and uncomfortable sight.”

Continue reading
“Doing What’s Right – Not Just What’s Legal”
Contact Information

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Please do not include any confidential or sensitive information in a contact form, text message, or voicemail. The contact form sends information by non-encrypted email, which is not secure. Submitting a contact form, sending a text message, making a phone call, or leaving a voicemail does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Copyright © 2025, Eric B. Meyer
| All Rights Reserved Worldwide.
JUSTIA Law Firm Blog Design