Easy there, folks. My servers can only handle so much traffic on a Thursday.
Legally Weird, indeed.
It’s not often that I get my scoop from an online publication called Legally Weird. Then again, touché.
No one is mistaking me for Bob Woodward.
Anyway, Legally Weird’s Molly Zilli reports here that an Atlanta man was talking to his wife when he accidentally pocket-dialed his boss. The problem, as you can imagine, is that the pocket-dialer was talking to his wife about his boss in less than flattering terms.
Yadda, yadda, yadda, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution’s Maya T. Prabhu reports here that, upon arriving to work the next day, the pocket-dialer received an ultimatum from his boss: resign or be fired.
Well, it wouldn’t be “legally weird” without what happened next. That is, the pocket-dialer and his wife filed a civil lawsuit against the pocket-dialer’s boss claiming that the boss invaded the pocket-dialer’s privacy by listening to the pocket-dialed conversation without the pocket-dialers consent.
Got all that?
But, is he legally right?
A couple of articles I read about this situation reference this Sixth Circuit decision, in which the appellate court held that one who accidentally pocket-dials someone else no longer has any reasonable expectation of privacy in any subsequent communication that the person receiving the call may overhear.
In reaching its conclusion, the Sixth Circuit cited the plaintiff’s deposition testimony in which he “admitted that he was aware of the risk of making inadvertent pocket-dial calls and had previously made such calls on his cellphone.”
***gently caresses flip phone***
The court then underscored that “a number of simple and well-known measures can prevent pocket-dials from occurring. These include locking the phone, setting up a passcode, and using one of many downloadable applications that prevent pocket-dials calls.” As support, the Sixth Circuit cited an online article entitled, “Prevent Unwanted Butt Dialing with Smart Pocket Guard.”
And I just died a little.
In discussing the reasonable privacy expectations of one who pocket-dials, the court likened it to “the person who exposes in-home activities by leaving drapes open or a webcam on and therefore has not exhibited an expectation of privacy.”
Did I catch you flinching? Maybe a little.
This new lawsuit is pending in Atlanta, which is not part of the Sixth Circuit. And while I’m not an expert on Georgia/Eleventh Circuit jurisprudence on invasion of privacy, my gut tells me that this latest pocket-dialer has an uphill battle ahead of him.
If I’m right, then the takeaway here is that, yes, you can fire an employee who butt-dials you and talks smack about the company.
What am I saying?!?!
“That’s a good lawyer, Eric.”