Close

Articles Posted in Sex

Updated:

EEOC sues “Bark If You’re Dirty” pet store for sexual harassment and sex discrimination. Because of course.

I enjoy blogging about employment law. But occasionally, perhaps after a long day, I wish some of these blog posts would write themselves. Last night, I got my wish. As an email subscriber to the press releases from the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, I’ve noticed an unusual amount of…

Updated:

Does Title VII only cover ultimate employment decisions? Another federal appellate court doesn’t think so.

Imagine a business that gives its employees two days off each week. There’s nothing abnormal about that. However, the company uses a sex-based policy to determine which two days an employee can pick. Only men can select full weekends off—women cannot. Instead, female employees can pick either two weekdays off…

Updated:

Can labor unions be sued for sexual harassment? (Spoiler alert: Yes, and they are costly!)

When most people think of federal anti-discrimination laws like Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, they associate them with employees suing employers for things like discrimination, retaliation, and hostile work environments. But Title VII covers more than just employers. For example, Title VII outlaws any employment practice…

Updated:

Can employees use their religion as an excuse not to work with LGBTQ coworkers?

Last week, the Supreme Court unanimously agreed that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 requires an employer that denies a religious accommodation to show that the burden of granting an accommodation would result in substantial increased costs in relation to the conduct of its particular business. The next day, the…

Updated:

Can a lateral transfer be discriminatory? The Supreme Court is about to weigh in.

Last week, the Supreme Court made it more difficult for employers to establish that an employee’s request for a religious accommodation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 creates an undue hardship. But there’s much more to Title VII than just religious accommodations. And the Supreme Court…

Updated:

Can blasting Eminem’s music create a hostile work environment? A federal appellate court thinks so.

At a workplace in Nevada, “sexually graphic, violently misogynistic” music from artists like Eminem and Too $hort “blasted from commercial-strength speakers placed throughout the warehouse, the music overpowered operational background noise and was nearly impossible to escape.” Employees complained about it “almost daily.” But management brushed those complaints aside and…

Posted in: Sex
Updated:

I’m naturally skeptical when an employee claims sexual orientation bias against straight people.

So when the plaintiff in this federal court decision I read last night cited as evidence of her employer’s heterosexual animus that her gay coworker received a cake and party by gay supervisors on his 30th work anniversary, whereas she did not receive cake or party for the same occasion,…