An employer-defendant argued that cancer — CANCER!!! — is not an ADA disability

How do you think that worked out? (I’ve got a pretty good guess too).

After the jump, let’s see if we’re right.

* * *

In EEOC v. Midwest Regional Medical Center, LLC (yes, the employer-defendant was a friggin’ hospital!!!), the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission filed suit on behalf of an employee who had been diagnosed with basal-cell carcinoma. According to the EEOC, the employee informed her supervisor of her cancer diagnosis and that she would undergo radiation treatment.

We’re not talking about a hangnail here, people. (Although under the ADAAA, a hangnail is probably a disability too, but I digress…)

hospital.jpg

Yadda, yadda, yadda, the company terminates the employee allegedly for violating its no-call/no-show policy. The EEOC alleges disability discrimination.

A cancer diagnosis is a “record of a disability” under the ADA.

The definition of “disability” under the Americans with Disabilities Act has three prongs. Under the second prong, an individual is considered disabled if he/she has a record of a disability (i.e., a history of, or has been misclassified as having, a mental or physical impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities).

The EEOC’s guidance clarifies:

“The intent of the [record of] provision, in part, is to ensure that people are not discriminated against because of a history of disability. For example, the record of provision would protect an individual who was treated for cancer ten years ago but who is now deemed by a doctor to be free of cancer, from discrimination based on that prior medical history.”

Yep, it specifically mentions cancer. Twice.

And because the employee’s doctor had diagnosed her with cancer, the Court had little trouble concluded that she had a record of a disability and, thus, a “disability” under the ADA.

Now, you may be thinking to yourself I’ll bet that Meyer has dreamy eyes, isn’t cancer an “actual disability” too?

The first prong of the definition of “disability” states that an impairment that substantially limits one major life activity is a disability too. Once again, under the EEOC’s interpretive guidance, cancer is a disability is “in virtually all cases.” However, in the case, the court concluded that disputes of material fact existed as to whether the employee’s skin cancer was an actual disability.

Bottom line advise for employers:

I find it hard to envision any scenario where an employee’s cancer is anything but an ADA disability. So, rather than argue that point, focus instead on reasonable accommodations for the employee to allow him/her to perform the essential functions of the job. Leave from work, may be once such accommodation.

That said, employers have the right to enforce their call-in/call-out rules uniformly, regardless of whether the employee has a disability. Therefore, make sure that your employees are aware of these rules and that your managers are enforcing them.

Updated:
  • MarySchaefer

    Eric, no comment except that I love your posts. Always good for a SMH moment.