Overtime: Two legal actions to reverse the outcome of the Saints-Rams NFC Championship Game

Rams-Saints-1024x548

Warning: This post has nothing to do with employment law. However, it is about the law and football. And, we’ll all have a good laugh about it.

If you watched last weekend’s NFC Championship Game between the New Orleans Saints and Los Angeles Rams, you know that the Saints got hosed by this fourth quarter missed pass-interference call. It basically cost the Saints their chance at the Super Bowl.

I can only imagine the anger that Saints fans have experienced in the wake of the team’s defeat. But how about:

  • Past, present and future mental anguish and emotional trauma;
  • Past, present and future loss of faith in the National Football League;
  • Past, Present and future loss of enjoyment of life;
  • Present and future loss of entertainment;
  • Distrust of the game which has become the National pastime.
  • Other damages itemized at the trial of this matter.

Wait, what?

Yep, in an action filed earlier this week in Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans in the State of Louisiana, “Tommy Badeaux and Candis Lambert, individually and on behalf of New Orleans Saints Season Ticket Holders, New Orleans Saints National Fan Base a/k/a The Who Dat Nation and any party with interest that has been affected by the outcome (of the game)” want justice!

But, according to a statement from their lawyer, this isn’t about the money:

[A]ny time the term “lawsuit” arises that the general public believes it was filed for financial reasons and compensation for damages. The petition filed by our office was not a petition for damages, but rather a petition for a Writ of Mandamus which seeks equitable relief and NOT monetary damages.

Is that even possible?

Well, according to Pro Football Talk’s Mike Florio (here) it is:

Consider Rule 17, Section 2, Article 1: “The Commissioner has the sole authority to investigate and take appropriate disciplinary and/or corrective measures if any club action, non-participant interference, or calamity occurs in an NFL game which the Commissioner deems so extraordinarily unfair or outside the accepted tactics encountered in professional football that such action has a major effect on the result of the game.” [I added the hyperlink]

It’s literally up to the Commissioner. The New Orleans Saints can’t compel the Commissioner to do anything. I’m not sure how, as a matter of law, the fans can force the issue either.

But, wait. There’s more (wishful thinking).

Another Louisiana law firm wrote to the Commissioner on Monday to advise that they had “been asked to investigate any and all potential causes of action that may exist against the NFL and the NFL Referees Association over the actions and/or inactions —”

That’s when I kinda glazed over.

But, then I regained focus and saw that the lawyers requested that the Commissioner act under Rule 17, Section 2, Article 3.

Let’s see what that says:

The Commissioner’s powers under this Section 2 include … the reversal of a game’s result or the rescheduling of a game, either from the beginning or from the point at which the extraordinary act occurred. In the event of rescheduling a game, the Commissioner will be guided by the procedures specified in 17-1-5–11, above….

So, conceivably, the Commissioner could order a do-over, either from the start or from the missed call. Except, as Mike Florio notes (here), as of the Wednesday evening, the NFL has not issued a public statement about the call.

If either law firm wants a Court to force the issue ***checks watch*** time’s running out.

Me? I’m betting on a Rams/Patriots Super Bowl.

 

 

 

“Doing What’s Right – Not Just What’s Legal”