Search
The Employer Handbook Blog
New Executive Order Bans “Racially Discriminatory DEI Activities” by Federal Contractors and Their Subcontractors
President Trump’s new executive order for federal contractors bans something called “racially discriminatory DEI activities.” Read the definition and you’ll find it’s just discrimination — conduct Title VII has prohibited for sixty years. What the order actually adds is a new enforcement mechanism, and that’s what federal contractors need to understand.
TL;DR: On March 26, 2026, President Trump signed an executive order requiring federal agencies to include a new clause in all federal contracts and subcontracts barring “racially discriminatory DEI activities,” defined as disparate treatment based on race or ethnicity in hiring, promotions, vendor agreements, program participation, and resource allocation. Violations can result in contract cancellation, suspension, debarment, and False Claims Act exposure, including whistleblower suits.
What the Order Actually Prohibits
The order defines “racially discriminatory DEI activities” as disparate treatment based on race or ethnicity in the recruitment, employment (e.g., hiring, promotions), contracting (e.g., vendor agreements), program participation, or allocation or deployment of an entity’s resources. “Program participation” covers training, mentoring, leadership development, educational opportunities, clubs, and associations sponsored by the contractor. That’s discrimination. It was already illegal.
What the order adds is a new enforcement mechanism: contract consequences and False Claims Act (FCA) liability.
The False Claims Act Piece Is the One That Should Get Your Attention
The new contract clause declares that compliance is “material to the Government’s payment decisions” under the FCA. That language opens the door to qui tam suits — whistleblower lawsuits filed on the government’s behalf, with the whistleblower entitled to a share of any recovery. The order also directs the Attorney General to consider bringing FCA actions against violating contractors and to prioritize reviewing private suits as they come in.
FCA exposure goes well beyond losing a contract. A contractor facing a qui tam suit defends itself in federal court against treble damages and per-claim penalties. The financial stakes are significant.
The Subcontractor Problem
The clause flows down to subcontracts at every tier. Prime contractors must also report any subcontractor conduct that may violate the clause and take remedial action as the contracting agency directs. Federal contractors now have a compliance obligation not just for their own programs but for every subcontractor in their supply chain.
What Federal Contractors Need to Do Now
- Audit your DEI programs against the order’s definition. Review any program — mentoring, leadership pipelines, ERGs with exclusive membership, vendor diversity initiatives — to assess whether it involves race- or ethnicity-based eligibility or selection. Programs open to all employees regardless of race are in a different position than those that are not.
- Extend that review to your subcontractors. The compliance obligation flows down. Identify which subcontractors have programs that could be characterized as racially discriminatory DEI activities. At a minimum, know what’s in your supply chain before a contracting agency asks.
- Watch for the new contract clause. Federal agencies have 30 days to begin including it in contracts, and the Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council has 60 days to issue interim guidance. If you’re in procurement or contract renewal now, expect to see this language. Have legal review it before signing.
- Document your compliance reasoning. The order is narrow on its face, but enforcement priorities and agency interpretations will shape how broadly it reaches. Litigation challenging the order is likely. Record your compliance analysis now, while your thinking is current.
Federal contractors have been navigating anti-DEI executive orders since January 2025. This one adds FCA exposure and supply chain obligations that earlier orders did not.