What’s the point of having a written handbook policy if you aren’t going to follow it? Better yet, what are the consequences of not following that handbook policy?
(Hint: they’re bad).
Find out why after the jump…
This recent federal-court age-discrimination decision underscores the importance of companies following their own established rules and protocols. The facts are not unlike many other discrimination cases. Put simply, the plaintiff here claimed that her employer demoted her because of her age. The employer responded by arguing that it had a legitimate business reason to reassign the plaintiff. And the plaintiff called BS on the “legitimate business reason,” suggesting that it was a pretext for age discrimination. That is, age was the motivating factor behind her demotion.
The court here found a reasonable juror could find that that the company’s failure to abide by its own misconduct procedures demonstrates pretext:
Furthermore, Plaintiff points out that Defendant’s documentation regarding her demotion is potentially suspect. All of the negative performance memoranda regarding Plaintiff was created on or after May 13, 2010, a mere eight days prior to the adverse employment action. The lack of documentation at the time of the supposed incidents of misconduct indicates, at the very least, that Defendant failed to follow its own misconduct procedures. While the timing of such documentation does not lead to the automatic conclusion that Plaintiff’s demotion was because of her age, it does support an inference’ that Defendant might be covering up a discriminatory purpose. (internal citations and quotations omitted; my emphasis added).
This case shows that not following the written policy you have may be worse than having no policy at all.
Image credit: newenglandinhouse.com