Recently in Sexual Orientation Category

March 13, 2012

Flyer claims Chick-Fil-A asks potential hires about sexual history

Over the weekend, I read this story by Laura Hibbard at the Huffington Post about a phony job flyer handed out by two men in red blazers posing as Chick-Fil-A employees [link to video] on the campus of New York University. The phony flyer states:

Remember Chick-Fil-A is a Christian company. We strive to have our values reflected in our employees. Please be prepared to discuss your religion, family history, personal relationships etc. upon interviewing. Chick-Fil-A reserves the right to question, in detail, your sexual relationship history. The Bible and Chick-Fil-A, define a traditional relationship as consisting of a man and woman. Anyone living a life of sin need not apply. The Chick-Fil-A Foundation. God, Family, Tradition.

The flyer and video have since gone viral. However, Chick-Fil-A, which has a stated corporate purpose to "glorify God by being a faithful steward of all that is entrusted to us," responded by posting on the wall of its Facebook Fan page (incidentally, 4,960,921 people "like" Chick-fil-A) that the flyer and video were BS. Given the company's religious leanings, the comments beneath Chick-Fil-A's status update are rather polarizing.

But since this an employment-law blog, there is an employment-law point to be made. Just because you technically can ask certain questions during a job interview, doesn't mean you should. Indeed, you may want to consider steering clear of these other 29.

But feel free to watch the vids below...

October 3, 2010

How do PA, NJ, and DE address discrimination based on sexual orientation?

Recently, I read an article by Bob Egelko in the San Francisco Chronicle about a speech from U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia in which he told law students from U.C. Hastings that the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees equal protection to all U.S. citizens, do not preclude discrimination based on sex. Justice Scalia believes that the drafters of the Constitution did not have sex discrimination on the brain when they passed the 14th Amendment.

Continue reading "How do PA, NJ, and DE address discrimination based on sexual orientation?" »