Earlier this week, Representatives Jerrold Nadler (D-NY), Carolyn Maloney (D-NY), Jackie Speier (D-CA) and Susan Davis (D-CA), introduced the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act.
What's in the bill and how will it affect employers? Find out after the jump...
Continue reading "Pregnant Workers Fairness Act introduced in Congress" »
My loyal readers know that yesterday the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission held a public meeting to discuss pregnancy discrimination and caregiver issues.
Conversely, my disloyal readers can go to hell. No, no, I forgive you. Just send me a check and we'll call it even.
*** Takes meds ***
*** Flashes Men In Black red light ***
Ah, yes, pregnancy discrimination. Click through for a summary of what happened at yesterday's EEOC meeting...
Continue reading "A recap of yesterday's EEOC meeting on pregnancy discrimination" »
The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) will hold a public meeting on the subject of pregnancy discrimination and caregiver issues at 9:30 a.m. today in Washington, DC. If you are in the area, feel free to stop by. The meeting is open to the public.
According to this press release, the Commission will examine "recent trends in discrimination against pregnant workers and workers with caregiving responsibilities, examining these two forms of discrimination as a continuum."
The timing of this meeting couldn't be better. The blogosphere has been abuzz about this recent decision in which a federal judge reasoned that lactation "is not pregnancy, childbirth, or a related medical condition" and, therefore, is not pregnancy-related. Consequently, "firing someone because of lactation or breast-pumping is not sex discrimination."
Methinks that may get discussed. I'll have a follow-up post on the meeting after it concludes.
I have no idea. I was hoping that one of you could help me out.
Oh, wait, I'm supposed to be the expert here. Ok. Fine. I'll play some music and dish the deets -- hint, it has something to do with the picture -- after the jump...
Continue reading ""Sex-plus" discrimination: Illegal? Yes. But what the heck is it?" »
That's right folks. It's time for another edition of "Fact or Fiction" a/k/a "Quick Answers to Quick Questions" a/k/a QATQQ f/k/a "I don't feel like writing a long blog post".
The answer to today's question is fiction. Pregnancy is not a "disability" for purposes of the Americans with Disabilities Act. To be considered a disability under the ADA, covered persons must actually have physical or mental impairments that substantially limit one or more major life activities. Pregnancy is not considered an impairment under the law.
However, when it comes to pregnant employees, keep three things in mind:
- The Pregnancy Discrimination Act prohibits pregnancy-related discrimination. It requires that employers treat pregnant employees in the same manner as male and non-pregnant female employees in determining their ability to work.
- If an employer offers temporary or short-term disability leave, Title VII requires the employer to treat pregnancy and related conditions the same as non-pregnancy conditions.
- Last week, a federal appeals court ruled, for the first time, that pregnancy-related health complications can render an employee "disabled" under the ADA.
I can pinpoint the exact moment that this blog transcended to the next level of internet excellence.
It was back in late March, when I blogged here about a female bartender/server who had sued her employer, the Wild Beaver Saloon, for pregnancy discrimination. The retweets that day were off the heezy fo sheezy, yo. (The hyperlink is a courtesy to my NPR listeners).
***Wait. Hold on one sec. I have to take this call from "1993". They say they want their dated hip-hop lingo back. OK, I'm back.***
When I first wrote about the Wild Beaver Saloon, the question was whether a business could make an employment decision based on the preferences of co-workers, the employer, clients or customers. I concluded, in this instance, that the Beave could not get away with it.
Well, the case ended last week. So was I right? Click past the jump to find out if I know my stuff...
Continue reading "Final score: Pregnant bartender 45,000 - Wild Beaver Saloon 0" »
Rep. Carolyn Maloney [D-NY14] is at it again.
A sponsor of a bill that would greatly expand the scope and reach of the FMLA, Rep. Maloney has co-sponsored another bill, the Breastfeeding Promotion Act of 2011, which would amend both the Fair Labor Standards Act and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to protect breastfeeding by nursing new mothers.
Under the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, which is part of Title VII, it is already illegal to discriminate in the workplace "because of sex" or "on the basis of sex," which includes, but is not limited to, because of or on the basis of pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions. The Breastfeeding Promotion Act of 2011 would amend Title VII to explicitly include "lactation."
The proposed legislation would also expand the breastfeeding provision of the Fair Labor Standards Act to cover salaried office workers.
According to a press release from Rep. Maloney, the Breastfeeding Promotion Act of 2011 would cover an additional approximate 13.5 million executive, administrative, and professional women in the workplace.
Employers that need more information on breastfeeding in the workplace, can check out these other posts at TheEmployerHandbook.com:
Congratulations!
Because you are reading this post, you somehow made it past your company's internet firewall. That, or you're a horny perv, Googling some effed-up search terms. But I'm a lawyer; I don't judge.
Either way, continue reading.
After the jump, it's the female bartender/server who is now suing her employer, the Wild Beaver Saloon, *** borderline-NSFW link *** because she claims they fired her for getting pregnant!
Continue reading "Booze, wild beaver, and a pregnant bartender. What!" »
Subscribe to this blog's feed
May 17, 2012 EEOC now publishes charge data, by state. Have a look... You can access the state-by-state charge data here here. And view it all in a...
May 16, 2012 How North Carolina's Amendment One Will Affect Employee Benefits Today we have a guest blogger at The Employer Handbook. It's Audrey Porterman. Audrey...
May 15, 2012 That was fast: Court voids NLRB "quickie" union-election rules The U.S. Chamber of Commerce is hot! How hot is the Chamber? Hotter than Paris Hilton humming...
May 14, 2012 U.S. Senate now has its own FB password bill; NJ nears similar ban Well, that didn't take long. Late last month, I reported on a bill that...
May 11, 2012 A Facebook firing? An employer in hot water? Ya don't say... Yesterday, I gave my social media in the workplace spiel to a great crowd...
May 10, 2012 Pregnant Workers Fairness Act introduced in Congress Earlier this week, Representatives Jerrold Nadler (D-NY), Carolyn Maloney (D-NY), Jackie Speier (D-CA) and Susan...
Browse entries by month
1500 Market Street, Suite 3500E
Philadelphia, PA 19102-2101
Phone: (215) 575-7283
Download VCard